OSES™ · Orchestrated Social Engineering Simulation
Your training stopsat the click.The attack doesn't.
OSES™ Platform: training beyond the click, secure behavior management. Measure your risk, train for what you find, and prove it changed, on one platform.
“Kudos to your entire team. We haven’t even seen the report and the whole company is talking about the risks of voice cloning. It’s been a huge win for us already.”
“I was expecting a demo, not an episode of Black Mirror. This is really good. I’m surprised at how advanced it’s gotten.”
“The training was well-structured, clear, and provided valuable insights into the growing threat landscape associated with deepfakes.”
Click Rate Cannot See
What Is Actually Happening
Attacks now arrive inside the platforms your people are told to trust. A cloned voice on a call. A deepfake face in a Teams meeting. Every security tool in the path works exactly as designed, and none of them owns the space between them. The process breaks before the person does.
One orchestrated scenario, every channel an attacker uses
Voice, video, and messaging coordinated into a single engagement, run against your people, your procedures, and the controls behind them.
What goes in.
What actually gets tested.
engine
See What a Real Simulation Looks Like
Measure your risk. Train for what you find. Prove it changed.
Three stages, one dataset running through all of them. Measurement without training is an audit finding. Training without a re-test is a completion rate. The third stage is the one almost no program runs, and it is the only one that turns any of this into a control.
Secure behavior management, on one dataset
Most programs stitch this together from three vendors: a simulation tool, a training catalogue, and a survey that claims to score the result. Nothing connects them, so nothing can prove the training worked. OSES™ runs all three stages against the same engagement data, which is what makes the re-test a real measurement rather than a second opinion. Three editions, one platform. What you start with follows the stage you are accountable for, not the size of the organization.
OSES™ Simulate
The simulation edition. Establishes the baseline, runs orchestrated scenarios across the channels that carry your risk, and produces the Social Engineering Risk Index.
OSES™ Behave
The secure behavior management platform edition. Risk-based security training aimed at the procedure that failed, then behavior change tracked through re-test.
OSES™ Measure
See how you rank in comparison to your vertical. Your measured exposure is reported next to the position of your sector, so the number arrives with the context that makes it actionable.
One console, all three stages
Scenario design, training, and reporting are the same product reading the same engagement data.
Design the scenario in plain language
Describe what you want to test, or paste a real-world attack to replicate. The playbook drafts itself with the persona, the goal, and the channel, and you edit it before anything runs.
Build the module from what failed
Start from scratch, from a policy document, or from the simulation a learner just fell for. The remediation module is generated against the procedure that broke, not a generic catalogue entry.
Report the movement, per channel
Every vector measured against your industry baseline, with the delta on each metric and the trend across re-tests. This is the artifact that goes to the board and the auditor.
How do you measure your risk?
Almost every number a security team currently holds on this describes intent. None of it observes behavior in a live channel.
What do you train, if not detection?
You train the procedure the simulation just broke, using the simulation itself as the source material. This is behavior-based security training rather than awareness content, and it is what a security behavior and culture program (SBCP) is supposed to deliver. Secure behavior management is the category Gartner named in 2026 as the successor to human risk management, and its founding argument is one we already held: labelling your workforce a risk does not change what they do.
Built from your own results
Training is generated from the engagement data, not selected from a catalogue, with the exact point of failure as the teaching moment.
Procedure, not tells
The lesson is what a person must do before acting on an instruction, regardless of how convincing the deepfake is. That holds as generation quality improves. Teaching people to spot a fake does not.
Written to be re-tested
Every module maps to a path that can be run again, so training is scoped to something measurable. A course completion is not a control, and it never was.
How do you prove it changed?
You re-test the same paths and report the movement, and the number that moves is the Social Engineering Risk Index. An index rather than a score, because a score grades a subject and an index positions a population.
Where do teams usually start?
Solutions map to attack vectors; editions map to the stage you are accountable for. Most programs begin with the one scenario leadership is already worried about, then widen from there.
A deepfake face and cloned voice delivered inside a live meeting or call, run as an authorized scenario against the verification procedure that is supposed to catch it.
ExploreVoice phishing simulation run as a live vishing penetration test: help desk impersonation, IT support impersonation, and finance approvals, where an AI voice cloning attack and a plausible reason are usually enough.
ExploreThe urgent instruction from a familiar voice, tested against the payment and approval procedure it is designed to bypass.
ExploreSynthetic faces, documents, and voiceprints submitted through liveness, document verification, and video KYC to establish real acceptance rates.
ExploreAutonomous agents driving research, contact, and adaptation end to end, so the scenario scales without a human operator on every conversation.
ExploreTraining that teaches the verification step rather than the tell, built to be re-tested rather than completed and filed.
ExploreCase Studies & Research
Real engagement findings, threat research, and platform analysis from the team running the simulations.
Questions Every CISO
Asks Us First
What is a deepfake red team engagement?
What is OSES™?
How is deepfake red teaming different from security awareness training?
Can employees be trained to detect deepfakes?
What is a deepfake phishing simulation?
How do you run a deepfake simulation exercise?
Do you run vishing simulations and CEO fraud testing?
Can deepfake phishing simulation be used in regulated industries?
Who is Breacher.ai for?
Get a real number
for your own organization.
Thirty minutes on the platform: how a baseline is scoped, what the training is built from, and what the re-test actually proves. You decide whether your process would have held.
Deepfake Defense Insights
How organizations are successfully defending against deepfake threats
