Managed Simulation Delivery
Buying the platform is the easy part. Running the program is where it stalls.
OSES™ generates the campaigns, and by default your team runs them. Managed delivery is the mode where we run them instead: scenario design, execution across email, chat, voice, and video, monitoring through the window, findings, remediation assignment, and the debrief your board actually reads. Priced separately from platform access.
Available as a single engagement or as a recurring annual program.
Where self-run programs stall
Almost never on tooling. Almost always on the hours between buying it and running it.
Scenario design is the work
A pretext that lands needs the vendor names, the approval chain, and the timing that make it plausible inside your organization. Pulling one out of a template library is why the second campaign performs worse than the first.
Multi-channel needs an owner
An email followed by a call followed by a meeting invite is a sequence with a timeline, escalation rules, and a stop condition. Somebody has to own that window, and on most teams that person already has a day job.
Results are not yet findings
A click rate is data. A finding explains which control failed, why, what changes, and how it compares to the last cycle. That translation is the part that gets skipped when the quarter gets busy.
What we run for you
Six pieces of work, run end to end. Take all of it, or the channels your team cannot cover.
Scenarios built from your structure: who approves payments, which vendors are live, how urgency normally arrives. Varied each cycle so results measure behavior rather than familiarity with last quarter's test.
Campaigns sequenced across email, SMS, chat, voice, and video inside one scenario, so the pretext follows the target the way an adversary would rather than testing each channel in isolation.
Cloned-voice calls run at concurrency across a defined population, with branching conversation rather than a recorded script. The channel that most reliably produces a finding nobody expected.
Conference call scenarios on the platforms your business already runs on, where the familiar face on the call is the entire pretext. Run inside a defined window with a named internal contact monitoring throughout.
Wire authorization and executive impersonation aimed at finance and approval paths. Written consent from the named executive is captured before any likeness is generated, covering the scenario, the window, and media retention.
Findings drive the training, not the calendar. Each finding maps to a micro training module, a one-time course covering the single behavior it surfaced, assigned and tracked alongside the standing annual curriculum.
Platform access, or platform plus delivery
Same platform underneath. The difference is who does the work.
How a managed program runs
Delivered on OSES™, our orchestrated social engineering simulation framework. The cadence is what makes it a program rather than an event, and the benchmark is what makes the second cycle worth more than the first.
Every engagement runs under signed authorization against your own organization, with named approvers, agreed scope and window, and documented abort conditions. Client names never appear in our public material. Sector position is drawn from the OSES™ Risk Index.
What you get back
Written to be acted on by a security team and read without translation by everyone above them.
Organizational, never individual
Results are reported at organizational and sector level. No named individuals, no department leaderboards, no personal vulnerability scores. Remediation is assigned at the behavior level, which is the only level where it changes anything.
Channel by channel
Where the organization held and where it did not, broken out by channel and scenario type. A workforce that resists email and answers anything on a call is a specific problem with a specific fix.
Evidence that survives review
Scope, authorization, method, and findings documented so the pack goes to auditors, regulators, or the board without being rewritten first. Trend across cycles is included from the second engagement onward.
Real scenarios, real findings
A cloned voiceprint run against verbal verification controls, and what it revealed about the step-up path sitting behind them.
Read the case study Agentic AIAutonomous agents driving synthetic media generation and delivery end to end, with no human operator in the loop.
Read the case studyWhere managed delivery earns its cost
Organizations that need the program to run on schedule regardless of what else lands that quarter.
Common questions
What is managed simulation delivery?
A mode where Breacher.ai runs the simulation program end to end: scenario design, execution across email, chat, voice, and video, monitoring through the live window, findings, remediation assignment, and the debrief. Your team stays on decisions and remediation rather than campaign operations.
Is managed delivery included with platform access?
No. Platform access gives your team the generation and orchestration capability to run the program itself. Managed delivery is a separately priced mode for organizations without a dedicated program owner, and it can be scoped for a single cycle or for the full year.
Do you need access to our systems?
There is no software to install and no integration into your stack. Simulations run externally against agreed targets inside a defined scope and window. Directory or scheduling access is optional and used only where a scenario calls for it.
How are executive likenesses handled?
Written consent from the named individual is captured before any voice or video likeness of an executive is generated. Consent covers the specific scenario, the window it runs in, and retention of the generated media. No likeness is produced without it.
Who sees the results?
Reporting is written at organizational and sector level. There are no named individuals, no department leaderboards, and no personal vulnerability scores. Remediation is assigned at the behavior level rather than published as a ranking.
How often should a program run?
A baseline followed by a quarterly cadence is the common pattern, with scenario variation each cycle so results measure behavior rather than familiarity. An annual single-channel exercise measures very little beyond who was at their desk that week.
What happens after a failed simulation?
The matching micro training module is assigned, a one-time course covering the single behavior the simulation surfaced. That is separate from the standing annual curriculum, which continues on its own schedule rather than being replaced by it.
Can we move to self-run later?
Yes. Both modes use the same platform, so scenarios, history, and benchmarking carry across without a migration. A common pattern is managed delivery for the first two cycles, then bringing the program in-house once the cadence is established.
Hand the program to someone who runs them
Thirty minutes. We will map your channels, populations, and cadence, and tell you which parts are worth running managed and which your team can hold.
Or read the full assessment methodology.
support@breacher.ai
